Nuhanovic Foundation

Reparations Database

Cécile Aptel; Prosecutorial Discretion at the ICC and Victims’ Right to Remedy, Narrowing the Impunity Gap, Journal of International Criminal Justice Vol. 10 (5)





Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.



Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Through the exercise of discretionary powers, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) selects from among the many offences which fall within the mandate of the Court a narrow set of crimes to be litigated. As a result, and also because of the complementarity paradigm, many victims of gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law fall into the impunity gap and have no access to judicial remedy. This article argues that the denial of the right to effective remedy (and reparation) to these victims potentially puts international criminal justice at odds with international human rights law. This tension should be addressed not only by supporting positive complementarity, but also by insisting that a broader range of cases and charges be pursued at the ICC.

Supporting victims and survivors of international crimes through litigation, advocacy and knowledge. Since 2012.

Contact Us

Recent Posts


Keep up with our latest updates.
© All right reserved 2023 Netherlands Centre for International Crimes. Site designed and developed by Civic Spectrum LLP