Nuhanovic Foundation

Reparations Database

T. Gregory The costs of war: Condolence payments and the politics of killing civilians





Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.



Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Coalition forces have spent upwards of $50 million on condolence payments to Afghan and Iraqi civilians in the last twenty years. These condolence payments were intended as an expression of sympathy rather than an admission of fault or legal liability, and indeed the program itself has been criticized for its arbitrary, inconsistent, and low valuation of civilian lives. This article argues that strategic – rather than moral – imperatives have increasingly underpinned this program and shaped its development: as coalition forces began to recognize the strategic costs, to themselves, of civilian casualties, money became General Petraeus’ ‘most important weapon in this war.’  

In this light, the author argues that condolence payments should not be seen so much as a humanitarian gesture designed to recognize and alleviate civilian suffering, or as a tool for transparency and accountability, but rather as a ‘weapon system aimed at securing specific military goals.’   The risk is that symbolic payments to the victims may fall into disuse in conflicts where mitigation of civilian harm secures no strategic asset. In this sense, condolence payments merely create an illusion that civilians have some additional protection on the battlefield. In fact, they offer little assurance that a similar incident will not occur in the future.

Supporting victims and survivors of international crimes through litigation, advocacy and knowledge. Since 2012.

Contact Us

Recent Posts


Keep up with our latest updates.
© All right reserved 2023 Netherlands Centre for International Crimes. Site designed and developed by Civic Spectrum LLP